Summit and Events
Model of Certificate of Compliance with Technical Provisions Concerning Exhaust and Noise Emissions and Safety Requirements for “EURO IV Safe", "EURO V safe", "EEV Safe" or "EURO VI Safe" Motor Vehicle
Guidelines/User Guide,
1 December 2012
Sharing Road Safety: Developing an International Framework for Crash Modification Functions
Research Report, Policy Insights,
1 December 2012
- Road safety policies should undergo performance and efficiency evaluations. Such evaluations cannot be undertaken without Crash Modification Functions (CMFs). Evaluation processes should be documented to ensure they are transparent.
- Research conducted to develop CMFs should follow the guidance provided in this report and, in particular, provide specific information that describes the countermeasure under consideration, the safety issue being addressed and the roadway environment in which it was tested.
- It is recommended that an international group be composed under an existing organization (e.g. Transportation Research Board, World Road Association, etc.) to foster dialog among researchers and practitioners on CMF research and reporting standards with the aim of increasing transferability of results. Coordination of research across countries on top priority countermeasures should be considered.
- International cooperation should aim to capture documentation and reporting of CMF research in a widely available transnational database.
- A concerted effort should be made to publicize the benefits of decision-making based on CMFs. This should take the form of: presentations and workshops at transport, injury prevention and health conferences; press releases; letters to political leaders and senior bureaucrats.
Sharing Road Safety: Developing an International Framework for Crash Modification Functions
Policy Insights, Policy Brief,
31 May 2012
- Road safety policies should undergo performance and efficiency evaluation. Such evaluations cannot be undertaken without Crash Modification Functions (CMFs). Evaluation processes should be documented to ensure they are transparent.
- Research conducted to develop CMFs should follow the guidance provided in this report and, in particular, provide specific information that describes the countermeasure under consideration, the safety issue being addressed and the roadway environment in which it was tested.
- It is recommended that an international group be composed under an existing organization (e.g. Transportation Research Board, World Road Association, etc.) to foster dialog among researchers and practitioners on CMF research and reporting standards with the aim of increasing transferability of results. Coordination of research across countries on top priority countermeasures should be considered.
- International co-operation should aim to capture documentation and reporting of CMF research in a widely available transnational database.
- A concerted effort should be made to publicise the benefits of decision-making based on CMFs. This should take the form of presentations and workshops at transport, injury prevention and health conferences; press releases; letters to political leaders and senior bureaucrats.
Competitive Interaction between Airports, Airlines and High-Speed Rail
Roundtable Report,
4 November 2009
Model of ECMT Certificate for Roadworthiness Test for Motor Vehicles and Trailers
Guidelines/User Guide,
1 January 2009
Model of ECMT Certificate of Compliance with Technical Provisions Concerning Exhaust and Noise Emissions and Safety Requirements for "EURO III Safe, EURO IV Safe" or EURO V Safe" Motor Vehicle
Guidelines/User Guide,
1 January 2009
Concurrence et interactions entre aéroports, services de transports aériens et ferroviaires
Roundtable Report,
1 January 2009
Terrorism and International Transport: Towards Risk-based Security Policy
Roundtable Report,
1 January 2009
Concurrence entre les ports et les liaisons terrestres avec l'arrière-pays
Roundtable Report,
1 January 2009