Rail
Urban Mobility System Upgrade
Corporate Partnership Board Report, Policy Insights,
31 March 2015
- Self-driving vehicles could change public transport as we currently know it.
- The potential impact of self-driving shared fleets on urban mobility is significant. It will be shaped by policy choices and deployment options.
- Active management is needed to lock in the benefits of freed space.
- Improvements in road safety are almost certain. Environmental benefits will depend on vehicle technology.
- New vehicle types and business models will be required.
- Public transport, taxi operations and urban transport governance will have to adapt.
- Mixing fleets of shared self-driving vehicles and privately-owned cars will not deliver the same benefits as a full TaxiBot/AutoVot fleet - but it still remains attractive.
Model of ECMT Certificate of Compliance of a Trailer of TPLW not Exceeding 3.5 Tonnes with the Technical Safety Requirements
Guidelines/User Guide,
1 January 2015
Model of Certificate of Compliance with Technical Provisions Concerning Exhaust and Noise Emissions and Safety Requirements for “EURO IV/4 Safe", "EURO V/5 Safe", "EEV Safe" or "EURO VI/6 Safe" Motor Vehicle (Lorry) of TPLW above 3.5 and not Exceeding 6 T
Guidelines/User Guide,
1 January 2015
КОНТРОЛЬНЫЕ ПРОЦЕДУРЫ для грузовиков с МРГВ свыше 3,5 тонн и не более 6 тонн начиная с 1 января 2015 года
Guidelines/User Guide,
1 January 2015
Control Procedures for Vehicles with TPLW above 3.5 and not Exceeding 6 Tonnes as from 1 January 2015
Guidelines/User Guide,
1 January 2015
Air Service Agreement Liberalisation and Airline Alliances
Case-Specific Policy Analysis,
1 December 2014
L’évaluation des projets transformationnels: Le cas du Grand Paris Express
Case-Specific Policy Analysis,
11 November 2014
Appraising Transformational Projects: The Case of the Grand Paris Express
Case-Specific Policy Analysis,
1 November 2014
Examen par les pairs du développement du fret ferroviaire au Mexique
Research Report,
1 February 2014
Дополнительная Информация К Статье 3.16 Руководства Пользователя Многосторонней Квотой ЕКМТ, 2014
Guidelines/User Guide,
1 January 2014
Дополнительная Информация к Руководству пользователя Многосторонней квотой ЕКМТ
Guidelines/User Guide,
1 January 2014
Article 3.15 and 3.16 – Provision Relating to Transit Through the Country of Registration
Guidelines/User Guide,
1 January 2014
Complementary Information to Article 3.16 of the User Guide on ECMT Multilateral Quota, 2014 and Control Procedures for Vehicles with tplw from 3.5 to 6 tonnes as from 1 January 2014
Guidelines/User Guide,
1 January 2014
The Model Certificate of Roadworthiness Test for Motor Vehicles and Trailers
Guidelines/User Guide,
1 January 2014
Model Certificate of Compliance of a Trailer with the Technical Safety Requirements
Guidelines/User Guide,
1 January 2014
Better Regulation of Public-Private Partnerships for Transport Infrastructure
Roundtable Report, Policy Insights,
24 September 2013
- A mix of financing models spreads risks.
- A dedicated budget for PPPs, set in relation to the rate at which future liabilities will be accumulated, can provide such a limit.
- Explicit consideration of alternative financing arrangements should be employed in determining whether to proceed with PPP projects.
- It is recommended that governments require PPP projects to pass tests of affordability and to clear the hurdle rates of return generally applied to publicly financed transport projects.
- The expected cost of PPP projects should take account of cost inflation resulting from the propensity for projects to be renegotiated.
- At the individual project level, risks should be assigned to the party best able to manage them, along with rights to make related decisions.
- Assigning demand risk is not straightforward and risk sharing arrangements are therefore common.
- Continuity of resources and expertise is essential for addressing strategic behaviour and optimism bias more generally.
- Regulatory agencies are well placed to ensure transparency and accountability by publishing reports on the criteria employed to make decisions and publishing contracts.